Just Published: The Three Schools of CCO Thinking

The idea that communication constitutes organization (CCO) comes in many flavors. You can have (and eat it, too) the omnipresent Montreal School with ties to French post-structuralism, McPhee’s four flows based on structuration theory, or Luhmann’s theory of social systems. Best of all, you can try out The Three Schools of CCO Thinking by reading our aptly named article just published in MCQ. Here’s the abstract:

The idea of the communicative constitution of organizations (CCO) has gained considerable attention in organizational communication studies. This rather heterogeneous theoretical endeavor is driven by three main schools of thought: the Montreal School of Organizational Communication, the Four-Flows Model (based on Giddens’s Structuration Theory), and Luhmann’s Theory of Social Systems. In this article, we let proponents of all three schools directly speak to each other in form of an interactive dialogue that is structured around guiding questions addressing the epistemological, ontological, and methodological dimension of CCO as a theoretical paradigm. Based on this dialogue, we systematically compare the three schools of CCO thinking and identify common grounds as well as key differences.

If you don’t have access to the PDF, please send me an email.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s